Dystopian Views

 

Dystopian Views

 Looking down from ones narrow perch, putting what one sees alongside what one can occasionally hear said, as some are quick to say in times of disagreement preferring their own macro overviews against those that can accumulate the granularity of the whole of life complexity. The assembling of such complexities help to create a usable platform from which to make some sense of the way things actually work and by amalgamating all the disparate elements that allows everything to form a whole, also perhaps understanding how those element are brought into existence with and by the essential nurtured ingredients. The macro viewers will say against the complex view, “Look at the bigger picture, you are not getting it”; this pronounced denigrating, for that is what it is, is often laid out as a way of closing down the minutia in potential flaws that may have been observed by some with “the big picture” yet is disregarded by cursory examination of the presentation of ‘painting’ the macro’s ‘big picture’. This is a tapestry, (if you like) to stand back from to be absorbed all at one quick look. This macro overview is an attempt to override the probably cautious assessment of the probability, possibility or practicality of gaining the implementation of the proffered ‘big picture’ or indeed the actuality of it that is being offered by disregarding the minutia of life environs which compound to makes the entire picture / tapestry work.

One might suppose that in many areas with innumerable examples it is possible to point to aspects of life that may on their own be taken as representation of showing the structure of a ‘big picture’. A way of offering a prospectus view of a direction of achievements that can be transferred to the whole of life’s environs, proof that the ‘big picture’ is viewable / understandable or indeed with intentional causal actions, being mouldable to certainty to form one. This certainty can be a reassuring position to have in as much that it offers the passable illusive prospect of command and control over what is being considered as the ‘big picture’ however one is of  the opinion that since the dawn of the modern age when it became possible to have access to a range of information and a certain amount of direct or influential power with which to make decisions to shade in the outline elements of a ‘big picture’, to create it whole in a preferred way, it has at the same time become a fixation to extend out, in inclination, to image the bigger picture, as a whole in its finality. This is to the detriment of actually seeing minutia detail that is required to form the ‘big picture’ in the first place and results in taking the unrealistic, possible unachievable overview of the ‘big picture’ as being the indisputable actuality.

In one way, an expansive overview of what may be thought of as the real actual big picture is likely to be one of special positions. Standing back or apart from what is being viewed is perhaps as a way of securing a certain self assured rationality overview for comprehension that is taken in observing the complexity in representation of what is being viewed as being, from the observers view point, appropriately all that is to be seen. For if it is examined too closely there may be imperfections in the composition that would upset the conception comfort derived from viewing at a distance, a macro view. Alternatively taking a micro view as opposed to the macro will show up the composite elements required to create the illusion of the pictures reality and if, one may supposed, that there are flaws, imperfection; is it still possible to hold the stance that the big picture overview is the most important one and ignore the micro constructs?

It is quite possible to savour the understanding or satisfaction of taking in the big picture where it seems others viewing the picture may not, due to them being hesitant to move past the composite elements they see that are essential to the creation of the whole picture. Such macro perception is easy self deception of course, it is done all the time in order to have an assumed grasp of the whole on which to base a practicable reality while consciously overlooking the intricate nature of the micro construction of functional realism. Often having to hold to an overview of the big picture is required in order to avoid being overwhelmed by the minutia of details in the face of necessity for some comprehension in what is being observed and the action for achievement of an acceptable conclusion, after knowing (understanding) what is being seen. Perhaps in a small way looking at minor inconsequential ‘pictures’ of, say life events, it is possible to take an overview and move lightly through each but with large scale viewed events, the micro detail becomes the essential foundation of the whole, sometimes difficult to see as it is over laid with the stark image of the whole but never the less choosing not to look at the form of the indispensible elements and their relationship to forming the whole, will one thinks inevitable lead to not really understanding what is being viewed.

Having said that, as above, it may be a worry if one has, with a degree of haunted compulsion, takes an elevated position on what is to be seen as a big picture of any state of affairs and assess the impressions gained from it. This is not a pleasant perch one has chosen from which to observe the following ‘big picture’, which just taking in the overview as a ‘snap shot’ may to others be too simplistic as it would of necessity overlook or disregard the unseen element of the composition as one has explained before, but from this elevated perch what is seen does not look good and as there are many prominent facets of it, what part of the ‘big picture’ does one look at to support a pessimistic or optimistic view. So holding the illustrated explanation of the big pictures construction from the above, one poses the question, is a certain future inevitable?

Assume one is a stranger that is asked to observe a composite big picture, one that is unusually in a moving contemporary three dimension format. It can be moved around different axis, expanded or gauge down to coarse scale, scrolled back to a number of set scenes or by extrapolation of what is seen, be project forward by a limit period and in all this be able to note the greater maturation influences that are merged throughout the whole picture. Unfortunately the time one has to view the picture is limited and many, what might be assumed quintessence elements of it, are not able to be given minute intricate assessment as they are deemed specifically variable transient, thereby unable to gain the insight intention, the motivations of its overall composite construction by the originator(s). One has to observe the contoured and shaded summaries of main block elements of the picture and one is to draw some conclusion from what is given off from “the big picture”.

This picture is of a habitat, one that has the appearance of a bluish tint but on closer view is dominated by a fluid which gives the blue aspect. It has land masses that strangely have compatible shaped outlines abutting the fluid sampled as water. It has extensive bio mass that appears to be dominant in the water and on most of the solar beneficial landmass. The micro bio mass exceeds by far the larger prevailing animals. These animals are in different forms both in the water and over the land. The main land dominate creature is bipedal broadly of similar structure of different hues in different areas of land mass and volume. Creatures which have a certain degree of intelligence to build independent protective habitats and displays technical creative abilities built on naturally sourced energy usage, suggest communication and organisational ability. There are large dense areas of habitation shown with high energy usage, more land mass with less notable energy output and areas of little to none. Energy sustenance for the bipeds appears to be primarily linked to the dependence of a solar cycle land use cultivation that shifts from magnetic poles. (Guessed already?)

From a limited observed period of time it is apparent that a number of culminate issues are impacting the bio sphere and positions inaccessible consequences for the animal forms. Reviewing past samples it has been seen that within a short period of solar phased time the overall life volume of the habitat has changed, it has less life diversity in the prominent liquid fluid, subsurface and exterior use. This seems to be a change that matches the reduction in oxygen content, raised carbon components and increase in abnormal chemicals of the atmosphere.  It is sequenced that the use of energy has been aided by wind flow extraction and may point to a constriction in the naturally sourced carbon energy. Also the mean temperature of the sphere has increased reducing the observable frozen fluid cover in some areas.

Bipedal densities, habitats, energy usages, and sustenance formations appear not to be of equitable spread around the sphere, assumptions for the reason are uncertain. What has been observed is the increase in the dominant bipedal life and energy output which may aid the pressure on all sustaining energy. To this observation, there seems to be a tendency at certain times to have different parts of the sphere with bipedal density to engage in eliminating many of its own kind and destroying habitats. This might be a species preservation act to limit density and a subsequent habitat rebuilding for accommodation efficiency of reduced bipedal volume.

From the limited time of observation and the extrapolation of main features it may be assumed that the bipedal specie, for whatever reason, is facing some environmental challenges evident in the change to composition of the bio sphere and the increased energy requirements to allow species expansion assisting overall raised degradations. It is uncertain what the limitation indicator points are for the species. Bipedal density has steadily increased within solar phased times and it is noted that it had a tendency to engage, on various parts of the landmass, periodic destruction(s) at different scales of impact with little ongoing effect on the increasing species density after mass specie loss; regarding the reduction periods, it cannot be determined to what purpose these destructive phases are for.

From the scrolled back observed records at the start of the bipeds effective use of manipulative apparatus age there has never been a prolonged period where no deconstruction can be found anywhere. A steady increasing phase of complex structural uniformity, bipedal equanimity, homogenous progression on all energy dependencies and consumptive levels is not evident.

A certain future for the sphere is not inevitable but elements may be expected. The changes to the bio sphere are progressive. Bipedal growth is expected. Bipedal destructive phases are expected as sustaining resource depletion increases. There is little homogenous progression throughout land masses. At this stage it is not known what mitigating factors, if any, are considered if being aware of fulcrum climaxes for its future.

Well this is just ones’ own bit of dystopian view and it no way covers the numerous intricacies that exist that are fundamental to all the biology of the sphere some of which would reinforce a disquieting view. Nor does it offer demonstrated intellect sophistication as any measure of mitigation for what is observed to the macro view. This is the big picture view seen from the lofty perch and of course one has ignored completely the species micro details that are the weft and weave of the tapestry - big picture, which influence inevitably has coordinative power but in slow time. However standing back and seeing the big picture as it seems to apply to the sphere may be the only time when to hear “Look at the bigger picture, you are not getting it”; might just be necessary!

And with this, one element of a future is: No, unified peaceful progression is not inevitable yet it has to be seen as the best evolutionary option as opposed to the alternatives.

Can the best option be achievable? Well, considering the above is it likely?

 

© Renot

050520211623